Ramesh impresses with ton

ScorecardSadagoppan Ramesh, the former Indian opener, impressed with 127 as Kerala ended the day at 223 for 6 against Railways at Delhi. Ramesh did the bulk of the scoring and was well supported by Sreekumar Nair, the captain, who contributed 34. Jai Prakash Yadav was yet again the most impressive bowler for Railways, picking up three wickets in his 21 overs.
ScorecardGoa wilted under Sanjay Pandey’s medium pace as his six-wicket haul bundled them out for 223 at Indore. Goa looked set for a big score at 92 for 1, led by Sagun Kamat’s half century, before Pandey struck back with three wickets in quick succession. The middle order failed to consolidate as Pandey and Abbas Ali wrapped up the innings in 78 overs. In reply, Madhya Pradesh lost the early wicket of Muddassar Pasha.
ScorecardAssam crawled to 205 for 8 against Vidarbha at Nagpur, pegged back by the spinners. Alind Naidu and Samir Khare shared five wickets between them, also restricting the scoring, as Khare gave away just 16 runs in his 12 overs. J Arunkumar looked set to score a half century but his dismissal, with the score at 118, triggered a mini collapse. Anand Katti was unbeaten at stumps with 41.
ScorecardShiv Sunder Das, the former Indian opener, made a welcome return to form with an unbeaten century against Jammu and Kashmir at Cuttack. Das’s watchful 126 piloted the innings, as Orissa ended in a good position at 248 for 3. Orissa ensured that they had the partnerships going, as Das added 78 for the third wicket with Subit Biswal, and later an unbeaten 61 with captain Pravanjan Mullick till stumps.
ScorecardRuns were hard to come by for Tripura as they were restricted to 205 for 8 against Jharkhand at Agartala. After being put in to bat, Tripura lost early wickets to seamers Sumit Panda and Rajkumar Yadav, and were at one stage 55 for 4. Subal Chowdury who scored 52, and Timir Chanda added 48 for the fifth wicket. Chanda remained unbeaten with a dogged 60, adding 66 with Rajesh Banik. Shahbaz Nadeem was the most effective bowler with figures of 3 for 48.
ScorecardAn aggressive 67 by Ajay Mannu lifted Himachal Pradesh to 255 for 8 against Services at New Delhi. Seamer Manish Jha and left-arm spinner Arun Sharma made early inroads, reducing Himachal to 100 for 4 before Mannu and Maninder Bisla added 51. Mannu and Mukesh Sharma added 81 for the sixth wicket before seamer Pankaj Kumar struck with three quick wickets towards the close.

Inzamam and Woolmer speak out

Bob Woolmer and Inzamam-ul-Haq are not just targeting individuals in the Indian side © Getty Images

As Pakistan prepare to take on India, both sides revitalised in recent months, in a series of considerable cricketing significance, both Bob Woolmer and Inzamam-ul-Haq were adamant that the entire Indian team and no one individual player will pose the greatest threat. Speaking at the press conference at Gaddafi Stadium before the first Test, scheduled to begin on Friday, Inzamam said, “There’s not been too much change in the Indian team from the last time they visited. They are an experienced team. They are all experienced batsmen and all capable of playing long innings. We have to work very hard to win this series and especially hard against their batting line-up.” Woolmer agreed, “All eleven Indian players are threats as will all our eleven. This will be a hard-fought series.”India’s batting line-up in particular will be a concern to Pakistan. As strong as it has been, it has also recently lengthened considerably with Irfan Pathan and Ajit Agarkar batting as low as number nine. Woolmer, however, was quick to point out that it isn’t a situation new to Pakistan. “All international sides have long batting orders now. Every team has to plan for that. Quite a lot of the time, the late order doesn’t get exposed to often to genuine spinners or fast bowlers. When they do, even they struggle.”The identity and composition of the Pakistan XI, for once, are the subject of little speculation. Inzamam confirmed noises from the camp in previous days that Shoaib Malik will open the innings, as he did against England. It means that Imran Farhat, recalled to the Pakistan squad after a year on the sidelines, will miss out on the opportunity to partner Salman Butt. Inzamam explained, “Regular openers are good but Malik has played well for us. In his innings against England, he stuck around and he has shown that he can play a long innings. He also gives us a big edge with his bowling.”There has been talk, over the last few days and in the build-up to the series, of the nature the pitch. Former players, among them Wasim Akram and Aaqib Javed had said Pakistan would do well to prepare seaming, bouncy tracks to combat India’s strong batting line-up. Nothing of the sort has happened and Inzamam was quick to dismiss any notion that the pitch was designed to suit his bowling attack. “It’s not a special wicket or anything. We have a wicket that is sporting and that helps everyone, fast bowlers, spinners and batsmen. Winning the toss will be an advantage obviously but I don’t think the wicket is such that the toss will make such a big difference.”Woolmer did point out, however, that spinners are likely to play a part at some stage in the proceedings. “Spinners will play a part especially if you look at the quality of those we have on tap here. Harbhajan Singh, Anil Kumble, Danish Kaneria, Shoaib Malik, Shahid Afridi are all going to have some say in a game of cricket. I think there is enough moisture in the air and underneath the ground to allow the ball to grip at some stage during the game. The ball will swing and seam as well and come onto the bat so some fantastic cricket can be played.”Unusually for Pakistan, the weather has also attracted undue attention in recent weeks. A colder than normal winter hasn’t helped preparations but as temperatures have steadily risen over the last day or so, Inzamam said his fast bowlers would benefit from it most. “The weather improving over the last couple of days is a good thing. It will help players in the game and spectators watching it as well. Mostly fast bowlers will benefit from the change in weather and I think Shoaib’s form and discipline is a good thing for the team in that sense.”Pakistan’s recent record at Lahore is promising; they have won the last four Tests at Gaddafi Stadium. That, however, said Inzamam is unlikely to play any role. “It doesn’t matter that we have won our last four tests here. It only matters that we perform well on the day and through the five days. Two years ago when we played India here our team was young and didn’t have that much experience of international cricket. They have that now, from playing in Australia and against England. We have learnt a lot from that and it is an advantage. We still want to improve more because there is still a lot of scope for improvement.”

'Warne is a negative bowler,' says Saleem Malik

Saleem Malik played over 100 Tests in a 21-year career© Getty Images

Saleem Malik, the former captain of Pakistan who is currently serving a lifetime ban after being found guilty of match-fixing, has spoken out about his country’s weak performances against Australia. Pakistan are 2-0 down heading into the third Test, which starts this Sunday (January 2), at Sydney.”Pakistan had the upper hand in both the matches as they started off well but due to lack of maturity they failed to press the Australians hard,” he told AFP on Thursday. “I am deeply disappointed by the manner we lost both the Tests in Australia and it was mainly due to lack of maturity in boys who are otherwise very talented. The batsmen have been too emotional. Besides the team, the management and the Pakistan Cricket Board lack maturity as they have appointed a foreign coach, Bob Woolmer, which is not our culture.”Malik, 41, also took a swipe at Shane Warne. “Warne has never been good against India, and if our batsmen played him with patience he wouldn’t get as many wickets as he gets against us,” he explained. “He is a negative bowler and tries to frustrate the batsman by bowling round the legs.”Malik, who made his highest Test score of 237 against Warne at Rawalpindi in 1994-95, rated him below Muttiah Muralitharan. “I think Sri Lanka’s Muralitharan is a better bowler because he comes good even when a pitch doesn’t suit spin bowling. Because I had trained with Pakistan’s great legspinner Abdul Qadir I had no problems against Warne. I used to play him with ease.”

Where next to conquer?

Cricket is a hard sell and takes time and effort to assimilate. But as the administrators map out their plans for the New World they must not forget the pastIt was said of Mikhail Gorbachev that his flair was for walking backwards into the future. Cricket shares that talent. Coping with the present has been hard enough, without worrying about what’s been round the corner.The period in which Wisden Cricket Monthly was founded was a rare instance otherwise. Having been elaborately repackaged and modernised in Australia during the intrusion of Kerry Packer’s World Series, cricket arrived in the 1980s a few months early, having been gifted a market for games in a day, in a night, in eye-catching colours and tri-cornered tournaments, with more pizzazz for television, greater rewards for players and advertisements between overs to bankroll both.Two dozen years later, cricket finds itself in another bout of serious forethought, led this time by the ICC. The ICC is finding that the earlier revolution wrought most of the more obvious changes and its activities have so far involved more of the same: more cricket, more television, more marketing, more money. The next wave of reform will be more fundamental, redesigning cricket for a rising generation of sports consumers and priming it for pastures new.Some years ago I was at an Australian Cricket Board function as the chairman Denis Rogers unfolded a vision of a globalised game. With great solemnity and ceremony he announced that Australia, as part of its ICC remit, would be taking cricket to China. One imagined a Lord’s war cabinet with a world map on the wall: “OK Australia, you take China; India, Asia; England, South America. The rest of you, spread out. Meet you back here in 20.”Extending cricket’s sphere of influence was never going to be that easy, for three interwoven reasons. Its initial spread was as an Imperial game. Its success sprang from its capacity to serve both colonial and nationalist ends, to be a means for the payment of homage and for the expression of independence. In post-colonial times it is drained of that meaning: it becomes simply a game to win, drawing its prestige from money and marketing. Invoking the riots at Lambing Flat, the goldfields scene of the worst anti-Chinese riots in Australian history in 1861, would only get you so far in building a Sino-Australian sporting rivalry.This throws the stress back on to the game itself. And, let’s be honest: much as we all love it, cricket is a hard sell. “No thanks,” said the pretty girl that RC Robertson-Glasgow, with “misplaced kindness”, once invited to a game. “Nothing ever happens at cricket; it is just all waiting.” Of course, it only seems to be – but she had a point. Cricket takes a long time. It can look spectacular, but isn’t designed for spectacle. It can entertain, but isn’t calibrated as an entertainment. The complexity and eccentricity of its tenets and techniques are not welcoming; many of its dottier rituals seem superfluous.Five-day cricket, regarded by those who know as the game’s paramount variant, is a particularly fiendish form in which to interest the uninitiated. A weak international football team can thwart strong opposition by throwing everyone behind the ball, aiming to grit out 90 minutes for a scoreless draw, and might even get an upset goal against the run of play; a weak Test XI, with 1,800 minutes of available time, will always get thrashed. As they are at present.Cricket, in other words, takes a bit of effort to assimilate: it’s the party you realise is great after an hour in the kitchen surviving the shock of seeing three ex-girlfriends on arrival, when you find there is heaps of beer in the bath and you know the songs they are playing. Many of the game’s subtlest and most confounding aspects, furthermore, are intrinsic to it. Change them for the sake of broader appeal and you endanger not merely the goodwill of the existing community but the very qualities that distinguish cricket from other games.It might be more helpful to render meaningful what is already there. There is nothing like seeing others enjoying a game, however strange, to encourage you to join in. At the moment there does not seem a lot of enjoyment going round. “International cricket feels flat, undramatic, even dull,” complained Scyld Berry in these pages a year ago. “Everyone is playing too much. Australia’s pre-eminence in the Test and one-day game has become predictable … `Cricket goes in cycles’ is an adage that only a fool will cling to.”Having shrugged off its amateur past, of course, cricket must bear a certain burden of professionalised tedium. It has spent its inheritance of great players who learned their cricket the old-fashioned way, rising through the established grades and playing at state, county and provincial level before higher honours. The generation that succeeded them, streamed into youth teams and academies as well as the first-class game, have been raised with different expectations: knowing that cricket could be their living, they’ve never needed to live for cricket. If the game today seems more routine, perhaps that should not surprise us. Has anyone paid money to watch you work lately?What can we say, then, about a quarter-century of professional international cricket? The trade-off was a necessary and unavoidable one: cricket could not withstand the tide of sporting commercialism. Television and sponsors had re-priced all games and the remuneration of players could not stand still. But, for players, it was only a partial emancipation. The attitude of boards of control since Packer has been an unconscious observance of Alfred Hitchcock’s advice regarding actors: “Pay them heaps and treat them like cattle.” And some heaps have been taller than others.It was this climate of mistrust and cynicism that smoothed the path to malpractice. When Sir Paul Condon’s anti-corruption unit reported to the ICC on match-fixing in May 2001, it noted that players were “not sufficiently involved in the administration of the game and ownership of the problems”. While the ICC does not have a great record taking advice from others, one might have thought it could take its own.Administrators have fared badly believing in cricketers’ worst instincts; it might be more fruitful appealing to their better natures.One would be even more emphatic about this had professional not become so pregnant with meaning. It suggests diligence, dedication, attention to detail, as in “professional qualification”, but it also implies contrivance, conspiracy and sleazy expedient, as in “professional foul”. Cricket is witnessing both: we have what might be called “professional appeals”, displays of calculated intimidation and petulance bearing no relation to the matter for adjudication, even “professional catches”, like the one for which Sourav Ganguly remarkably escaped censure during the World Cup final. These displays are not evidence of an overabundance of high spirits, or of being supremely tough and competitive: they’re just cheating. To make the most of the dividends of professionalism, players must confront some of its less appetising manifestations. It will not only be beneficial for the game; it will make the case for their influence in it unassailable.We are at a hinge moment in cricket’s history – a tipping point, to use the expression beloved of marketers and military men alike. A new age beckons; the trappings of the old are slipping away. But while cricket should not walk backwards into the future, the occasional glance over its shoulder might still be useful.Gideon Haigh is a Melbourne-based cricket writer and author.The Wisden Cricketer launches on September 19. Click here to subscribe.The September 2003 edition of Wisden Cricket Monthly is on sale at all good newsagents in the UK and Ireland, priced £3.40.

Ranji round-up

*North ZoneKavaljit Singh scores a doubleJammu & Kashmir batsman Kavaljit Singh notched up a double centuryagainst Services in their Ranji Trophy league match at Delhi.Services, in reply to their rivals’ first-innings total of 350, scored287, led largely by fifties from Jasvir Singh, Arun Sharma, and CDThomson; Jammu bowler Jagtar Singh picked five wickets. The close ofplay on Day Three saw Jammu & Kashmir at a score of 133/4.At Rohtak, Himachal Pradesh bowler Shakti Singh scalped five batsmenin dismissing Haryana fpr 264, giving his side a lead of 74 runs. AjayRatra, fresh from his match against the visiting English side atJaipur, top-scored for Haryana with an unbeaten 72. In their secondinnings, Himachal Pradesh were 108/2 at stumps on Day Three.At Amritsar, Punjab made a strong reply to Delhi’s first-innings totalof 499. After Mithun Manhas (193) and Pradeep Chawla (142) hadslaughtered the bowling, Punjab’s batsmen looked like they wouldfollow suit when opener Manish Sharma fell for 1. The next threebatsmen, however, scored centuries – Ravneet Ricky made 100, YuvrajSingh 102, and Dinesh Mongia 102. Punjab were 385/7 at stumps on DayThree. For Delhi, Amit Bhandari picked five wickets.*South ZoneShock collapse for HyderabadInspired perhaps by one of their ilk breaking into the national squadfor the first time, Kerala’s bowlers ripped through a strong Hyderabadbatting line-up, dismissing them for only 117 on Day One of theirRanji Trophy league match at Cochin.With Suresh Kumar and Rejith Kumar picking up four wickets each, onlyDaniel Manohar could make a significant score – 35. Kerala, in theirreply, were 80/3 at the close of play.In the other South Zone match, Karnataka batsman Barrington Rowlandwaged a lone battle against Tamil Nadu, striking 113 off 221 balls.His fellow batsmen, however, could not display similar application,and Karnataka could only notch up 215 in their first innings. TamilNadu, in reply, were 39/1 at stumps on Day One.*East ZoneBihar batsmen make merrySkipper Rajiv Kumar and Saurav Shukla both notched up centuries,propelling Bihar to a total of 412 in their Ranji Trophy league matchagainst Tripura at Agartala.Kumar (113) and Shukla (120) shared a huge partnership for the fifthwicket in reply to Tripura’s first-innings total of 394, ensuring thatBihar would not lose the match and, in all probability, would pick upfive points from the likely-to-be-drawn tie.Tripura were 50/3 at the close of Day Three, and Bihar could very wellnotch up a win if they can bowl their rivals out and then make theremaining runs for victory.In the other East Zone match, Bengal’s batsmen notched up a fifty-runfirst-innings lead over Assam at Kolkata. Sukhvinder Singh, for thevisitors, picked six wickets, hastening the end of the innings. Forthe home side, skipper Rohan Gavaskar top-scored with 86. After making299, Bengal had Assam at 147/6 at stumps on Day Three.*West ZoneMumbai complete comprehensive winputting on a mammoth first-innings total of 553, Mumbai bowlers thenwreaked havoc with Baroda’s batting line-up, winning their RanjiTrophy league match at Vadodara by an innings 141 runs.After Ramesh Powar disheartened the Baroda bowlers by scoring 110 off134 balls coming in at number nine, Paras Mhambrey (3-27), NileshKulkarni (4-15) and Avishkar Salvi (3-41) then dismissed Baroda forjust 89. Nayan Mongia was the only resistance, scoring 17 off 100balls. When they followed on, Baroda could only muster up 323, handingtheir rivals a comprehensive triumph.At Rajkot, Gujarat opted not to take advantage of a sportingSaurashtra declaration, playing for a draw and picking up three pointsfrom their match. Saurashtra, declaring their second innings closed at157/7, set an eminently achievable victory target of 270 off 50 overs.Gujarat reached 138/2 by the close of play on the last day.

Final Test evenly balanced after Pakistan take lead

Karachi, March 13: Muttiah Muralitharan continued to be an enigma forthe Pakistan batsmen as Sri Lanka pulled themselves back intocontention of the third and final cricket Test being played here onMonday at the National Stadium.Muralitharan pushed Pakistan on the backfoot when he picked up twocrucial wickets on Monday evening after the home team appeared to runaway with the match after Shahid Afridi and Mohammad Naveed Qureshihad provided them with the best opening start of the series by scoring70 in 18 overs.But Muralitharan trapped Naveed in front of the wickets and thenearned a controversial decision against Ijaz Ahmad to restrictPakistan to 88 for three at stumps on the second day.Ravindra Pushpakumara had provided Muralitharan the inroad by sendingShahid Afridi’s off stump cartwheeling.Pakistan had earlier dismissed Sri Lanka for 227 to secure a 29-runfirst innings lead. It was the first time Pakistan snatched the firstinnings advantage after surrendering a 171-run lead in Rawalpindi and69-run lead in Peshawar. Sri Lanka won both the Tests by two wicketsand 57 runs respectively.Pakistan, who have never lost a Test here in 33 matches, lead thetourists by 117 runs with seven second innings wickets in hand. Thematch, which was heading Pakistan’s way 14 overs before close, is nowevenly balanced.Nevertheless, Pakistan bowlers aggressive approach was undone byMuralitharan’s menace who now has taken his tally of wickets in theseries to 24. When Sri Lanka won the series here in 1995-96,Muralitharan had picked 18 wickets.Interestingly, most of Muralitharan’s victims in the series havefallen to bat and pad catches which proves the Pakistan stroke-makersinability to counter his spin and overcautious approach.Muralitharan, the undoubtable spin king, achieved a personal milestonewhen he reached 250 wickets in 51 Tests by accounting for Naveed. Theopener, who was looking compact in defence while scoring 27, foundhimself a bit unlucky to be declared leg before as the ball wasapparently spinning down the leg-side.But it was heartwarming to see Shahid Afridi stroke the ball on meritand show patience. He played sizzling drives until he was beaten by areal beauty from pacer Pushpakumara. Afridi’s 59-ball 34 was spicedwith six boundaries.Until Pushpakumara dismissed Afridi and Muralitharan got his actstogether, the Sri Lankans, for the first time, appeared a disjointedunit. Their shoulders were drooped and the body language showed thatthey had run out of steam.The reason maybe that they had already clinched the series inPeshawar. The other reason might be that they are at the fag end of awonderful tour and consequently keen to return home early.Sanath Jayasuriya’s leadership also came into question for the firsttime in the series when he delayed the introduction of Muralitharanuntil the 17th over. A bowler, who has mentally destroyed the Pakistanbatsmen, should have been brought into the attack much earlier.Nevertheless, Sri Lanka’s belated fightback on the second day’s cannotdiscredit Pakistan who dominated six of the seven hours play. Day’splay was extended because Pakistan’s over-rate was well below therequirement. Only a miracle can save them from being penalized bymatch referee Brian Hastings.Waqar Younis showed his experience of bowling on a green top track bypitching the ball upto the batsmen while Shoaib Akhtar displayed hisspeed with controlled line and length. Shahid Afridi exhibited hisutility by snapping up two wickets.The double change in the team management was also evident as thereappeared a set plan and purpose behind the bowling. The Sri Lankanbatsmen were not given much width or room to play their trademarkextravagant shots. Field placings were near perfect while the bowlingchanges were timely and calculated.But Pakistan’s strategy was nearly pierced by pint-sized RomeshKaluwitharana who punctuated nine boundaries in his 29-ball 42. Butalert fielding restricted the little dynamite from inflicting furtherdamage when Naveed’s accurate throw from square-leg beat the SriLankan wicket-keeper by yards who tried to steal an impossible secondrun.Jayasuriya was deliberately fed outside the off-stump before theskipper perished when Ijaz took a sharp catch off Shoaib Akhtar. WaqarYounis kept the ball on the right spot until he found the outside edgeof Mahela Jayawardena’s bat after having trapped Marvan Atapattu infront of the wickets off a sharp banana-like inswinger.Russel Arnold, who missed a century by one run in Peshawar, was notgiven free strokes on his favourite leg-side. He eventually lost hispatience and slashed a wide delivery off debutant Irfan Fazil to besmartly caught at third slip by Younis Khan.Indika de Saram, who had just two scoring shots in his 22-ball five,tried to take liberty against Shahid Afridi and was caught at mid-on.Tillekeratne Dilshan tried to cut a ball too close to his body andcaught by Moin Khan who had given him a life three runs earlier.Dilshan masterminded Sri Lanka’s revival after they had slumped to 46for three in the first hour. He added 54 runs for the fourth wicketwith Arnold and remained a silent spectators in another partnership of54 with Kaluwitharana.Waqar Younis finished as the most impressive bowler with two for 39but Shoaib Akhtar was the most successful bowler with three for 52.Shahid Afridi bagged two for 40 but Irfan Fazil had a nightmare debutwhen he was hit for 35 runs from his four overs for a solitary wicket.

Steve Smith double-century pushes England to the brink once again

England 23 for 1 trail Australia 497 for 8 (Smith 211, Labuschagne 67) by 474 runs

For about two overs on the second day at Old Trafford, Steven Smith looked fallible as he resumed his comeback innings after yesterday’s preamble half-century. Stuart Broad found his edge with his first ball of the day, then induced that rarest of aberrations, a waft outside off from his second.Moments later, it appeared that Smith’s neurotic focus had found the root of his discomfort – a rogue van’s windscreen, visible through the slenderest of gaps in a gate behind the bowler’s arm, and winking at him with unfathomable persistence, much as the North Star might after one too many disco biscuits.But even after a towel had been lodged under the wipers to block out the glare, Smith was unable to settle immediately, and three balls into Jofra Archer’s first over of the day, he pumped a low full toss at a catchable height through the bowler’s outstretched fingers and away to the boundary for four. A final, flighty fence past leg stump followed. And there and then, England knew, deep in their souls, that their window of opportunity had clanged shut.Fidget, shuffle, nudge, smack. Rinse. Repeat. Back and across, coiled like a pinball launcher, way outside off if needs be, to clip a perfectly decent ball off the hip, or to pongo onto the front foot for another freakishly emphatic drive, bat pointing to the precise patch of grass that he had targeted, rubbing in his genius while simply completing the arc of his stroke.For the remainder of his 263-ball, 497-minute stay, Smith batted as if he had never been away – which, but for that delivery from Archer at Lord’s, he might indeed never have been. Once again, he encountered an opposition that ran out of plans and patience in equal measure, as he found sufficient support from, first, Tim Paine and then Mitchell Starc to leave England praying for more rain to assist the series-extending draw that is surely now the limit of their ambitions.By the time he eventually fell for 211, reverse-sweeping the part-time spin of Joe Root (having frogmarched England’s frontline bowlers to the brink of that inevitable declaration), Smith had racked up a nonsensical haul of 589 runs in four innings, at an average of 147.25 that would have been closer to 200 but for his brave but unwise decision to resume that Lord’s knock while displaying the early signs of concussion.Steve Smith celebrates his century•Getty Images

And by the close, the ease of Smith’s own progress had been put into stark perspective by the agonised extraction of England’s own erstwhile No.4, Joe Denly. Promoted to open due to Jason Roy’s clear unsuitability for the task, Denly endured for 23 balls and four sketchily gathered runs, before stabbing Pat Cummins into the midriff of Matthew Wade at short leg, who snaffled the rebound brilliantly in one hand, diving to his right.The difference between Australia’s focus and England’s was as visible in that final half-an-hour with the ball as it had been for so long with Smith’s bat. Starc, armed with the new ball after stewing on the sidelines for three Tests, looked as “cherry-ripe” as Archer in particular has looked fatigued in this contest, while his fellow quicks, Josh Hazlewood and Cummins, were no less eager to show what can yet be achieved on this surface.But it was the energy in the field was the most palpable difference. For if England could be excused for being blown off-track by the howling gales of the first truncated day, today’s (largely) blue skies robbed them of any mitigation. They needed to be at their best on a pivotal day of the series, but they were by and large as poor as they’ve been all summer.Smith’s first century of the day, his third of the series, was a formality – ushered through with a misfield at square leg, and celebrated with a pointed wave of the bat that doubled as a “hello, I’m back”. It was his fifth in his last eight innings against England, his 11th in Ashes cricket, and his 26th in 67 Tests all told. Comparisons with Don Bradman have long been sacrilege in Test cricket, but the relentless weight of these numbers are starting to scotch all complaints.There was, however, one moment that stood head and shoulders above all England’s other errors. Jack Leach has had a storied summer – that 92 as a nightwatchman at Lord’s, that most glorious of 1 not outs at Headingley last week. And with the ball, all things considered, he was probably second only to the toiling Broad as England’s most probing option of the day.But when, with Smith on 118 and showing another fleeting glimpse of mortality against his relative kryptonite of left-arm spin, Leach found the edge of his bat with a flighted, dipping, ripping delivery that sent every data analyst in the game into raptures, the moment was immediately lost as replays showed that he had overstepped by a good half an inch.A spinner’s no-ball is one of cricket’s unforgivable sins, and traumatically for Leach it was only his 13th out of more than 15,000 in his career. But what a delivery to serve one up on. Smith turned on his heel, marching back to resume his innings through a phalanx of crestfallen fielders, who were immediately torn a strip by a livid Joe Root, desperately trying to lift some flat-lining standards. But once again, that window of opportunity was already shut.The absence of Smith, after all, would have meant the presence of another not-Smith – but even the less impossible task of making dents in the rest of the batting order proved to be beyond England, at least at the first grasp. Earlier in the day, Matthew Wade had gifted his wicket with a foul slog to mid-on, where Root clung onto a swirling chance that left him white with relief, but when the under-pressure Tim Paine arrived to replace him, the equally under-pressure Roy dropped a shocker at second slip, the ball barely hitting the heel of his palm before plopping to the turf to leave Broad, the bowler, apoplectic.Paine is without a first-class century in 12 years, and is increasingly lacking in mandate as Australia captain now that Smith, for all his sins, is so clearly restored as the team’s front-man. His removal for 9 would have left him with a highest score of 34 in seven innings. But instead he found the resolve to grind through to a cathartic half-century, albeit that he required another let-off to get there, as Sam Curran – briefly on the field for Ben Stokes – dropped a low pull at mid-on on 49 as Archer bent his back in the best spell of his wicketless innings.Paine didn’t last much longer – he nicked a fine legcutter from Craig Overton’s first ball after tea to depart for 56 – but his presence had augmented Smith’s dominance of a stand of 145, and though Pat Cummins didn’t linger long, Starc’s eagerness to get involved in the series manifested itself in the ideal tailender’s innings.His 54 from 58 balls included seven fours and two sixes, but began as a keen supporting role, just 6 runs from 23 until Smith’s double-century gave him licence to unleash the long handle. Broad was hacked for four fours in a row to kickstart a helter-skelter finale that might have carried on to the close against a despondent attack, had Paine not waved them in with half-an-hour of the day to go.By then, of course, Smith was gone – an event so rare that it would have justified on of the Don’s bespoke “He’s Out!” billboards, had the Manchester Evening News deemed it worthy to publish a special edition. His nudge behind square off Broad pushed him ever further into into the elite of Ashes combatants, with only the Don himself (EIGHT!) and Wally Hammond (4) having recorded more double-hundreds in the game’s oldest rivalry.Either way, his series tally is 589 runs from four innings, one of which was effectively sawn off by concussion. And now, after this latest masterclass, the only dizziness on display is that being induced by the vertigo of his statistics, and the bewilderment of an England opposition that must now be believing that Headingley was a fever-dream after all.

Vettori unfazed ahead of South Africa tour

His biggest test yet: Vettori prepares to lead New Zealand for the first time in Tests © Getty Images

Not even Stephen Fleming, who was widely considered one of the modern game’s most astute leaders, has led New Zealand to a series win in South Africa. But the recently installed captain, Daniel Vettori, has no qualms about taking over the reins ahead of his side’s three-Test tour which gets underway in November.”I have thought about the responsibilities and have planned how I want to do things,” Vettori said at Sydney before flying out to South Africa. “I like to think I have always thought about the game. Really, it is not too much of a step up.”Vettori took over the one-day captaincy from Fleming after the World Cup and, in September, the selectors decided to install him as the Test captain too. But although he only has limited experience in captaining Northern Districts at first-class level, he isn’t alien to the role and has substituted for Fleming on occasions.”While I haven’t done the job full time, I have done enough to take confidence from what I have done,” he said. “But I’m not silly enough to see it [the captaincy] as a bed of roses. It is more of a progression. We know Stephen Fleming is going to retire at some stage and I’m pleased to have been given the opportunity to follow him.”One criticism levelled at his leadership in the past has been a tendency to underbowl himself, an accusation he stringently denies. “Anyone saying that has probably got it wrong,” he said. “I think the thing I have done well is bowl at tough times. I have no problem managing my own bowling. I’m happy to bowl after 10 overs if the situation so demands, just as I’m happy to bowl at the death.”New Zealand will play two Tests, a Twenty20 international and three one-dayers on their South Africa tour. Preceding those are two warm-ups against South Africa A, the first of which is at Potchefstroom on October 25.

Bulls ride to victory after Perren blitz

Scorecard

Clinton Perren launches one of his seven sixes © Getty Images

Clinton Perren smashed 82 from 37 deliveries to set up a Queensland victory in the first Twenty20 match of the season. Despite the extraordinary bowling of Tasmania’s Michael Dighton, who claimed 6 for 25, the Bulls’ 202 was enough as a Nathan Rimmington hat-trick ended Tasmania’s hopes.Perren blasted seven sixes and six fours and together with Nathan Reardon, whose 54 came from 31 balls, did the damage before Dighton kept the Tigers in the game. Dighton, a batsman who has not taken a wicket in 49 first-class matches, kept the scoring down in the late overs after the front-line spinners Daniel Marsh and Xavier Doherty proved expensive.But the visitors could not match Queensland’s run-rate and were dismissed for 164 in the 19th over. Rimmington, who finished with 5 for 27, picked up four wickets in five balls to end the fight. George Bailey made 41 from 26 balls and Michael Di Venuto scored 36 from 19 but tight bowling from Rimmington and Ashley Noffke made the chase difficult.

Lillee happy for Warne to break record

Dennis Lillee captured 85 wickets in 1981 © Getty Images

Dennis Lillee says Shane Warne deserves his record for the most wickets in a calendar year and won’t be sad if it gets passed during the first Test. Warne enters Friday’s South Africa match with 84 victims for 2005 and needs only two to pass Lillee’s 1981 collection.”It’s all his. He deserves it,” Lillee said in . “He can come and get it. There isn’t a bit of sadness there for me in passing on the record to the greatest bowler we have seen. I have always really enjoyed Shane’s career and what he has brought to the game.”Lillee, the Western Australia Cricket Association president, will be at the WACA and should get a first-hand look if Warne can make some breakthroughs on his least successful Australian ground. Warne’s role in Perth is as a support bowler to the fast men and he has taken only 26 wickets in ten Tests.”We have always got along well and he has had to overcome a lot of setbacks to get where he is,” Lillee told the paper. “He has had an amazing career and I am really looking forward to being at the WACA when he breaks the record.”Lillee’s incredible 1981 included 85 wickets at 20.95 in 13 matches with Test series against India, England, Pakistan and West Indies. In the first Test against West Indies he broke Lance Gibbs’ world record of 309 wickets with first-innings figures of 7 for 83.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus